This site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Click here for more information
Want to build a more inclusive culture within your organisation? Ready to support all your people and help them perform at their best? Looking to join a network of world-class coaches and take on the workplace’s biggest challenges? Then let’s talk.
Fill out the form below with your question or query, and we’ll get back to you shortly. Or use the information on the right and call or email us directly.
"*" indicates required fields
Milton Gate, 60 Chiswell Street, London, EC1Y 4AG, United Kingdom
1350 Avenue of the Americas, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10019, United States of America
Marketing Team
If you’re talking workplace culture, chances are you’re talking psychological safety. This concept, introduced 25 years ago by Dr. Amy Edmondson, centers on creating environments where people feel they can speak up, share ideas, and take risks without fear of backlash or ridicule.
In a recent Talking Talent panel discussion, workplace leaders shared their insights on whether psychological safety is still relevant and how to apply it—especially in diverse and polarized work settings.
Panelists included:
Panelists Agree: It’s Table Stakes
Psychological safety isn’t just a “nice-to-have”—it’s essential for building a culture where people can thrive and companies can grow.
“I think of it as the foundation of the culture we need if we want to get good performance out of people—whatever good performance looks like,” Giachardi said. For her, that applies not just in the workplace, but in families, schools, and communities as well.
Testing the Waters: How Psychological Safety Shapes Who Speaks Up and Who Stays Silent
Panelists shared their own experiences with psychological safety, and Pinder spoke about her journey as a Black woman in corporate America.
“Early on in my career, being assertive or confident as a woman of color could be mistaken as anger,” she shared. “And so you retreat into a sort of self-inflicted invisibility. And you never really get to test out the environment to see if it’s an environment of psychological safety, because you can’t afford to be career limiting.”
She talked about the murder of George Floyd being a watershed moment for some people, because it opened the door to conversations about inequities.
“It gives you license, and it gives you permission to then test the waters to say, ‘Okay, let me see if I can have this conversation. Let me see if this is a psychologically safe environment for me to show up authentically as myself.’”
Giachardi, on the other hand, talked about having a sense of freedom to “speak hard truths” and being valued for it. Some of that is built into her role, but also because her leaders set the conditions for open dialogue.
“I get a bit of license to do that because of the job I have,” she explained, “but ultimately I wouldn’t be able to if they weren’t also setting up the conditions for me to feel that’s acceptable.”
Linking Psychological Safety with Inclusion
Next up, Race pointed out that psychological safety has become part of the vernacular around DE&I. Studies show that diverse teams are more effective, higher performers.
“But there are certain ingredients that need to be in place, inclusion being one of them,” Race said. “There’s no point in having a diverse team if that diverse talent isn’t able to have a voice.”
Giachardi concurred, referring to psychological safety as a spectrum, with inclusion being the first necessary step. “If you don’t have that, you can’t get any further,” she said. “You can’t get to the point where people are really contributing and challenging each other.”
Pinder emphasized the need to welcome diversity beyond what’s visible externally. “It’s one thing to have a diverse look, but it’s another to have diverse perspectives and diverse thinking, which is what you really need.”
“We’re quick to code things as mainstream or not. So if someone presents with an opinion or perspective that goes against that, those opinions are not always welcome,” she continued. “So what we really have to do is take a step back and reflect on what does it mean to have inclusion for all?”
Race suggested that overlooking ‘inclusion for all’ mayhave fueled backlash toward the DE&I agenda. “We’ve got to take everyone on the journey,” she said. “That’s where psychological safety plays a part. For individuals who were for centuries the majority, maybe they don’t know how to navigate this new world of work—they don’t know what language to use or what questions they can ask.”
Myths and Misunderstandings
While psychological safety is crucial, panelists agreed there’s a tendency to misuse or misunderstand it in key ways:
“I think the word ‘psychological’ throws people off,” Giachardi said. “Some assume it means never feeling challenged, but the reality is that psychologically safe spaces are often where difficult conversations happen.”
Key Takeaways from the Q&A
The Q&A brought out some important themes on how to apply psychological safety across diverse roles and settings:
The Future of Psychological Safety
Psychological safety is here to stay, but it requires continued effort.
“We need clarity on what it actually means, and leaders need to be upskilled in psychological safety,” says Pinder. Giachardi agrees, noting she wishes we had a different, more accessible, word for the concept.
Ultimately, for our panelists, psychological safety is not just a buzzword—it’s the foundation for healthy, productive teams. The more organizations understand and invest in it, the better prepared they are to foster inclusive, high-performing cultures.
Written by Talking Talent
30 Oct 2024
Share this article
Milton Gate, 60 Chiswell Street, London, EC1Y 4AG,
United Kingdom